Our method

We start with the player’s task.

Each page is built around one problem a player is actively trying to solve. Similar wording is combined when the task and answer are the same; a new URL is not a reward for finding another keyword variation.

Sources have an order.

We prefer developers, publishers, official game and platform pages, and repeatable in-game evidence. Maintained databases and community discussions can add context, but important claims do not become facts simply because they are repeated.

Freshness needs a trigger.

Patch notes, server changes, expired codes, platform updates, and real player searches can trigger a review. We show a checked date where freshness matters and avoid calling a page “live” when it is not.

Corrections stay part of the record.

When evidence changes, the page should change with it. Material corrections are recorded instead of silently presenting an old claim as if it never existed.